KLAS Contact
Contact KLAS
Contact KLAS
2024 BEST IN KLAS
Preferences
Related Series
2022
2020
2018
2017
2015
2013
2012
2011
2011
2010
2009
2008
2008
2007
2007
2006
2006
2006
2005
2005
2005
Related Segments
Ambulatory PACS 2008
Improving the quality of patient care and increasing efficiency are the twin goals of automation in imaging. Given the many PACS choices available to imaging centers, orthopedic clinics, and multi- and single specialty physician groups, potential buyers are led to wonder which vendors can supply their particular needs. Which vendors provide a stable product that is able to scale to higher volumes? Which integrated PACS/RIS products are commonly utilized? In this era of the Deficit Reduction Act (DRA), which vendors are reporting growth, and which ones are losing business? Which vendors consistently deliver?
For this research, KLAS conducted interviews with over 550 ambulatory organizations regarding the experiences they are having with their PACS vendor.
Products qualifying for ranking in the study were:
- Agfa IMPAX
- AMICAS Vision Series
- Aspyra AccessNET
- Avreo interWORKS interVIEW
- DR Systems Unity
- eRAD PACS
- FUJIFILM Synapse
- GE Centricity IW
- Infinitt PACS
- Intelerad IntelePACS
- McKesson Horizon Medical Imaging
- Merge Fusion PACS MX
- NovaRad NovaPACS
- Philips iSite
- RamSoft PowerServer PACS
- ScImage PicomEnterprise Radiology
- Sectra PACS
Early findings were also included for BRIT Systems BRIT Roentgen Files, Carestream PACS, Empiric Systems Encompass.NET PACS, GE Centricity PACS, Intuitive Imaging Rational Imaging PACS, Medstrat echoeSYSTEM, RADinfo SYSTEMS PowerPACS Radiology, RAYPAX PACS, SIMMS PACS, Stryker Imaging OfficePACS Power, and Thinking Systems ThinkingPACS.
This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2024 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.